Cross-Train Your Brain

by Jane Gassner of ByJane

33927987-1Reinvention:  that seems the buzzword of the moment, and oh, how I do relate.  More magazine has devoted an entire issue to it, offering Arianna Huffington as the ultimate serial reinventor.  They’ve even got a contest going, Tell Us About Your Second Act.  Like Ms Huffington, however, I’m on my fourth or maybe fifth act.  And like Kelly Corrigan, writing in O magazine, I feel somewhat sheepish about the way I have never been able to settle on just one thing to do.  I write, I edit, I make art, and I make jewelry.  I also garden, knit and, hey, this website,  MidLifeBloggers, I’m making that as well.    My days are filled from morning to night, but never with just one thing.  I am, in fact, constitutionally incapable of any kind of singular focus.  My life has been lived, and what successes I’ve had, follow a shotgun methodology:  I spray the woods and where the buckshot lands, I go gather the goods.  I resist the sneers of those who call me dilettante and I insist my way is The Way.  But secretly, as I said, I feel guilty.

Now, here comes Ingrid E. Cummings telling me that not only do I have a place in the world, more people should be like me!  In The Vigorous Mind, Cummings argues for “a return to a Renaissance perspective, when the ideal was to be well-rounded.”  Her thesis is contained within the subtitle:  “Cross-Train Your Brain to Break Through Mental, Emotional, and Professional Boundaries.”   Such cross-training, claims Cummings, is an antidote to the singularity of purpose that has created hyper-focused specialists, a state that may lead to success, but also leads to sterility and burnout.  Instead, Cummings is positing a world in which we follow our natural inclinations, and then some.

There are, she says, two kinds of people: Generalists and Specialists.

“Generalists view the world as if from an airplane flying at thirty-six thousand feet, and thus excel at identifying opportunities and threats.  Specialists are implementers, thriving at the grassroots level.  Specialists are subject to the bias that comes from soaking in their own vat of expertise. . . . Generalists are subject to missing nuance due to their lack of in-depth expertise.  Generalists typically are not grade-A implementers or detail hounds.  So specialists are about depth; generalists  are about breadth.  At the risk of oversimplifying: generalists define problems and specialists solve them.”

Our Western culture, particularly here in the United States, privileges the specialists, but really, as Cummings goes on to say, “generalists and specialists complement each other.  You want some of both at work.  You want some of both in your own makeup, ideally.”

So, in The Vigorous Mind, Ingrid Cummings sets out to help us–be we generalist or specialist–achieve that complementarity in ourselves.  She has created a methodology, using a form of the Zen principle of kaizen, along with a technique she calls Triumph in Twenty.  Through this we can wend our way through the Seven Imperatives that Cummings claims are the foundation of the attaining the balanced life she espouses.  She calls this goal the Vitruvian Capability, so named after da Vinci’s famous symbol of the Renaissance man.

I applaud Cummings’ thesis.  She’s made me feel much better about myself, that’s for sure.  Too, I’m always up for anything Zen; just as I’m always down on the self-help genre that spawns alliterative catch phrases.  However, f you’re a Specialist, or you’ve found yourself landlocked in your life–you might want to try cross-training your brain.  And if you do, then this book will be your training manual.

Popularity: 41% [?]

  • Burgundy Evans

    Right after I spent 2 hours scanning web sites looking for a job and coming to the conclusion I am overqualified for what I can do and under qualified for what my job description says I can do, I opened this site to find the perfect blog.

    My career path has resulted by default,not intention. My interests and talents are diverse, not easily marketable. The best example is an interview I had at a major Fortune 500 publishing company. My resume was a combination of creative and business positions. I was interviewing for a job that I have easily managed.My resume showcased my creative and business experience. I had the business experience to get the job but the creative experience confused the recruiter. It wasn’t seen as a plus. Her exact words were , “Who are you?”

    I still can’t answer that question. Where do I buy the book?

  • Harmony

    Burgandy,
    I think we need to have a conversation. Is this site the right venue for it?

    My career path has resulted from intention, not default. I’d get interested in something, say ‘I want to do that’, do it and then get interested in something else. What I see this book giving me is the ability to answer the question, Who Are You? I’m a generalist, a Renaissance woman, a Synthesizer. That’s on my good days. On my bad, I’m a f**kup.

    Harmony

  • http://www.duchessomnium.com Duchess

    Well, I hope no one throws virtual rocks at me for saying so, but I think women are more likely to have minds that range broadly and are at the same time (on average) less capable of the kind of single minded focus that gets you to the top of a single career. I have always assumed that this is simply adaptive and that women’s brains evolved that way: if you are undistractable, you may not respond to that crying infant.

    I have no idea if this is bad science, but it makes sense to me.

    Whatever, I too have a scatter gun, jack of all trades approach to life and career(s) — such as they have been.

  • http://midlifebloggers.com byjane

    Duchess-
    I agree. It seems that the single-mindedness of specialization is a male thing. Another arena in which they’ve made their proclivities The Right Way To Be.

  • http://inventingliz.blogspot.com Liz

    I’m not sure which category I belong in! What I am good at is becoming a specialist very quickly, but then I get bored and want to move on to another area. I need to feel challenged by what I am doing, to feel like I am learning something new every day. Now I’m experimenting with becoming a generalist, and my dream is to have two or three different activities that bring in enough income to support myself – so when I get bored by one, I can go do one of the others for awhile!

  • Candy Turner

    Sounds like this book should have my name on the front cover after “Especially for…”. I think my mother was actually a kaleidoscope. It’s high time I get my act together. My life has been fun, but I haven’t seen what I consider to be any accomplishments in my 58 years on this earth. My friends admire my carefree attitude. I admire their retirement plan. Like Burgundy, I had an employer ask me the same exact question – “Who are you?” – a few months back. I didn’t have an answer! I haven’t gotten that far yet. Maybe this is the catalyst I need.

  • Harmony Evans

    Duchess,

    Interesting, I never thought about the colloralation of distraction and attention. Makes perfect sense.

    Harmony aka Burgundy or is it Burgundy aka Harmony,

    No this may not be the right venue. You are a brilliant thinker who has embraced your interests without society’s definition of success, i.e. CEO, Chair of the English Department, Pulitzer Prize novelist, etc.
    Pick one.

  • BarbD

    I haven’t read the book but my instincts tell me I’m a Generalist. And for the last 10 years or so of my corporate career, I had the best of both worlds — a job I created and molded according to my wide-ranging interests (covering both communications and technology). I’m quite proud of what I accomplished!

    I left the corporate mother ship last year on the wings of an early buyout. I’m not sorry I left but as I attempt to put together a downsized career as a freelancer, I find it hard to describe exactly what I do so well. Write? Edit? Check. Website maintenance? Check.

    What I’ve still not found easy to explain in a 30-second elevator speech is how I synthesize the hard skills with the creative abilities to come up with new ways of doing things.

    One year into my latest adventure, I’m still searching for something I can feel passionate about again. Maybe it won’t be work that does it this time — I don’t know. The only thing I’m sure of is that my range of abilities make it more likely I’ll find work to support myself while I’m looking!

  • http://www.bloominginmidlife.com Elaine H

    Oh, is this ever me–and thank God someone is showing that it’s a positive and not a negative. Although I think women like Huffington have proved that you can reinvent yourself over and over, and still rise to the top, so the belief that a woman has to be single-minded in her career approach seems to be pure old-think. What this book might do is alleviate some of the anxiety those of us who are schizophenic in our talents feel about being square pegs in a round-holed world. It sure does mess up your LinkedIn prodfile, though :-) !

  • http://tlcbooktours.com/2008/12/ingrid-cummings-author-of-the-vigorous-mind-on-tour-january-2009/ Ingrid Cummings, author of The Vigorous Mind, on tour mid-January to mid-February, 2009 | TLC Book Tours

    [...] Wednesday, February 4th: MidLifeBloggers [...]

Previous post:

Next post: