MidLifeBloggers: Defining the Brand

Do not expect coherence from this post.  Bear with me throughout and then maybe at the end, you’ll tell me what I was talking about and where I was going.  I started this one day after reading the umpteenth piece of advice about how to advance my brand:

Before I was a brand, I was a blogger.  And before that, I was just a person. I liked being a blogger; I’m not sure I like being a brand. And if I’m a brand, what am I?

I know who I was as a person: a woman, American, Jewish (yes, these are ordered as I feel them).

I know who I was as a blogger: sharing whatever in my life seemed relevant at the time whether it was big or small, earthshattering or quotidian.

But as a brand? Who or what am I? What do I look like? What do I sound like?

Don’t think for a moment that I go from this to a kneejerk resentment of the way blogging has evolved over the seven (!) years I’ve been doing it.  All along I’ve worked, and sometimes struggled, to find my place and feel at home in the blogosphere.  This is no different.

If I were actively parenting, I could make a soft landing into that Mommyblogger niche, with the ever-growing myriad of ways that being a mom is being expressed on-line.  But I’m not, and thus that niche, which has come to be almost the only one that offers ready access to women, is closed to me.  For a while, I tried to read “woman” for “mom,” just so I wouldn’t feel so excluded.  But that works less these days, because the issues of parenting seem to have become the cause celebre and raison d’etre of the Web.

So if I’m a brand and parenting is not a part of my brand, then what and who and why am I?  Below, in no particular order, some of my answers to that:

  • I’m a woman of a certain age–just put me in the Baby Boomer cohort–who remembers the Good Old Days, but has no desire to return to them.  They’re a fond memory that she likes to visit occasionally, to laugh at, cry at and say, thank God, that’s over!
  • I believe that my best days, my most fun, my greatest success is still in front of me.  My daily life and my future plans all center on realizing my ever-growing potential.
  • I’m not thrilled with all that time has wrought on my face and body, but I don’t resent it either.  Aging is what it is.  Rather, aging is what each of us makes of it–and I refuse to waste a moment lamenting the ageism or the youth bias of my culture.
  • That said, I am a ready and willing target for any and all skin care preparations.  Even though I know nothing is going to magically erase the wrinkles, the marionettes lines and the age spots that I’ve accumulated through living, I’m still loving rubbing this or that on my face and peering into the mirror to see–hmmm! maybe this one does actually make a difference.
  • My interests are not defined by my chronological age. I love fashion and pop culture and still read most of the women’s fashion magazines, even if I’m not exactly outfitting myself in the latest Mark Jacobs.  Actually, Stella McCartney would probably be my choice, but that may be because I’m still just the tiniest bit in love with her father.  I still have the same issues with dressing that I had ten, twenty, thirty, forty years ago:  does this make me look fat?  do I look stupid?  how can I express my personal style in a way that is flattering and affordable?
  • When it comes to running my household, I am always on the lookout for what is new and different.  I may not have the cleanest house of all my friends, but I have more cleaning products and accoutrements than they do. It’s like a treasure hunt to find new things that promise instant and easy results, even though, as with face care, I do know that the results are always a product of my efforts.  I think, perhaps, that I amuse myself with trying new mops and soaps and sponges; it takes the tedium out of actually cleaning.
  • I am educated (some would say over-) and smart (some would say too) and articulate (some would say mouthy).  I’ve spent a fortune in therapy which has given me the ability to think before I speak, but when I do, to say what I believe to be true.  This is a problem for some who are not similarly direct; others love it.  I’m befuddled by both responses.
  • With all apologies to Family Circle et al, I am no longer looking for expert advice on any of the subjects I care about.  That’s why you will never find a How To or service-type post on MidLifeBloggers.  What I am looking for is what you did and how you worked it out and why you chose whatever.  Our tagline is Making The Best of MidLife Together.  Collectively, we’ve got all the wisdom we need, which means that this is a brand that’s all about sharing.
Photo credit: plrinternetmarketing.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/carmen.neutral Carmen Neutral

    Hello. I’m so glad to have come across this blog and your post. I have never had children, and since turning 50 and probably for years, have felt somewhat “out of place” or more accurately, others made me feel out of place because I haven’t had children.

    People assume we’ve all had children, and therefore imagine so many other
    things about us. So fitting in, in the mommy-bloggersphere is strange – which
    is why it’s good to here voices like yours. I’ve written a guest post some
    might relate to about midlife job hunting at:
    http://midlifexpress.com/wanted-midlife-jobseeker-elephants-apply/

    I’ve also developed my own blog called: 50 Shades of Unemployment. http://50shadesofunemployment.blogspot.com.au/

  • Nordette Adams

    WOW! I’ve been experiencing this feeling for at least five years. Great post.

  • Joanna Jenkins

    Interesting post, Jane. I my mind’s eye I can see your brand clearly but I could’t tell you what it is in 25 words or less.

    Like you, I do not have children so that knocks me out of a huge blog category. I’m also not older than dirt– which, apparently the marketing gurus who send me story pitches think I am based on the products they want me to write about. It feels like there is a giant “brand” missing between the “mom years” and the “golden years”.

    Oy

  • Pingback: Wednesday Writers Workshop: The Paris Review Interview | MidLifeBloggers

  • http://www.secondlivesclub.com/ Marylfloyd19

    I have an extensive background in brand marketing for some of the big names. Maybe that’s why I don’t confuse it with anything we personally do in the blogosphere. Call it what you want but when I read your bullet points, Jane, I connect passionately with every last one of them. They’re a much more eloquent way of phrasing what we’ve tried to capture in our blog’s manifesto. (I even just did a post on Stella McCartney.) You can replace “mommy” with midlife, boomers, reinvention, choice. They all work for me. But I’m with Barbara…..I like blogging but realizing how much time it takes to blog and comment, I can be a brand if someone wants to pay me!

  • http://barbarashallue.typepad.com/ Barbara

    I’m a niche-less blogger myself. To be honest, I didn’t know about niches when I started, but I didn’t start out to make money from my blog, although that changed when I realized how much time it took. But if I’m a brand, I have no idea what it is!

  • Barry Nora

    If branding is really storytelling, then there should be a huge “brand” for women who are no longer mommy-bloggers but who have not yet had a hip replacement. We are, as you point out, educated and out there. And we’re underserved.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Hitt/767401701 David Hitt

    There’s an irony here which is that what “branding” is all about is the desperate search by made-up corporate entities to try and create a “real” personality for themselves. Frankly, it sounds like you already have a brand;. You’re a well-spoken and well-educated woman in her middle years with a particular outlook on life and multiple opinions.

    I actually am in advertising and I read “branding” blogs with some regularity. Frankly, there is a grossness to them I detest. The whole point is that “branding” really is the ceaseless and ultimately impossible quest to make something human that isn’t.

    It’s humanity others crave. Provide it in abundance and I suspect you’ll be just fine.

    • Jane

      @David Hitt,
      Thanks for your comment. I get that branding in its traditional sense is about corporations. What I’m referring to here is the way it has seeped down into the blogosphere. I think this is a function of the commercialization of personal blogs. Suddenly, the marketers are interested in us as “influencers.” Suddenly, we’re making money from our blogs. Suddenly, there are a host of “experts” coming to advise us on how to do it better–and that’s where all the advice about branding comes in.

      What I’m getting at in this post (I think!) is that after years of not paying attention to stats and such, I’m suddenly thinking–hey! why don’t I get in on that? And that leads to thinking about MidLifeBloggers as a brand. Why would a marketer want to be involved with us? We’re a niche that has a lot to offer; how do we “brand” that?
      Jane

  • Lserwylo

    Perfect, and well put. Brand, shmand. I yam what I yam and that’s good enough.

    • Jane

      Love the Popeye reference!

  • http://injaynesworld.blogspot.com/ Jayne

    I’ve never tried to find or be a brand or fit into any particular place as a blogger. I wouldn’t have any idea how to do anything other than the eclectic collection of writing that I do.

    • Jane

      But you do have ads on your site. So at some level (perhaps that deepest darkest, Dr. Freud), you’re aware of your site as a brand.

      • http://injaynesworld.blogspot.com/ Jayne

        I got rid of all the Blogher ads and now I only have ones for my book and movie and the book of a friend. I don’t make any money off them.

  • Sarah Piazza

    I’ve spent the last year moving away from being a mommyblogger. It’s harder than you would guess… But I’m glad of it now. I am, of course, still parenting. However, however… my kids are teens, and I cannot blog about them anymore.

    • Jane

      Sarah,
      Is moving away from being a mommyblogger the hard part? Or being one in the first place?

      You have moved into a totally different arena, yes. It’s as if a parenting magazine was replaced by a literary journal! I’m loving it–and am in awe–and wish we could have the kinds of ‘what pencil do you use’ discussions that have driven the Paris Review.
      Jane

  • Pjpusser3

    Terrific article and so honest sweetie. You are good. Love Laurie

    • Jane

      Laurie,
      Trying to figure it out on paper–or, in this case, screen–has always been what I do. Thanks for reading–and especially for commenting!
      xxoo
      Jane

  • http://twitter.com/ToscaSac T

    Brands can transcend the business is I think the point of the distinction. Like being an A list actor means you can play various roles instead of you had one hit show and have become a certain character type cast for life. Who called you a brand or why did you start to think you had made the switch? I am a mom but a woman and a coffee drinker first. I blog about my life at this age and other thrilling disasters.

    • Jane

      T,
      I love that you identify as a coffee drinker! Perhaps Yuban could sponsor some of your posts!

      As to who called me a brand, it’s in the air of the blogosphere, or at least that part of it that I inhabit.
      Jane

  • ann tracy

    maybe it’s b/c I don’t keep track of other bloggers, but I don’t see the big parenting focus…. I identify as an artist who is a women who is a feminist… of course I’ve never ID’ed as a parent anyway and thought that those who do did so to the determent of their own passions and interests. I don’t care what your kids are doing, what are you doing besides the compulsory job of being a mom!

    • Jane

      Ann,
      That you aren’t aware of the big parenting focus in the blogosphere is, I agree, probably a function of your not being involved with the community of bloggers. A lot of bloggers I know of identify as artists and feminists and moms–that’s who they are!

Previous post:

Next post: